This is the mail archive of the
guile@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: Scwm docstrings change
Sam Falkner <samf@central.sun.com> writes:
> I'll vote on Greg's side, where SCM_PROC expands to a function header.
>
> I do a lot more C programming that scheme/lisp, and I usually avoid
> macros in C. That said, though, I think that the SCM_PROC is cleaner,
> the main reason being that you don't have to duplicate the arg list
> for reflection (as was mentioned later in the thread I think).
>
> Also, I'm not really comfortable with the idea of providing both
> options (as has been suggested later), but I suppose it would be okay
> as long as the core of Guile stuck to one way or the other.
I intend to stick with the combined GUILE_PROC expands into a function
header technique in the Guile sources except where the connection
*needs* to be made externally (I'm not sure if this will come up until I
make the change).
Greg