This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: Bad define placement?
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Bad define placement?
- From: Richard Frith-Macdonald <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 20:39:33 +0100
- Cc: email@example.com
- References: <37C6E7F8.26BB@yahoo.com>
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999 21:33:12 +0200, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> --- Jost Boekemeier <email@example.com.TU-Berlin.DE> wrote:
> > James Dean Palmer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > > I've gotten a new error with 1.3.2 on some code
> > that worked with 1.3.1:
> > Mikael has ported Aubrey Jaffers enhancements to
> > guile's evaluator.
> I hope that's a good thing. This define thing infected
> so much code that it should maybe be made standard.
Well - I'm one of those people who thinks that Guiles performance is
important - so if this change enables significantly more efficient evaluation,
If not - I'd certainly agree - permitting define in the middle of a block
(eg immediately before the variable is used) can make for much more readable code.