This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
> From: Jost Boekemeier <jostobfe@calvados.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE> > > The module system is not complete but the basic machinery is there: > > scm_apply_in_module (proc, arg1, args, module) Would it make sense to change that to scm_apply_in_module (module, proc, arg1, ...) i.e., put the module first and make a variable number of arguments? Just a thought, no long rants from me if you think not. > scm_eval_in_module (x, env, module) ::= scm_eval_in_module (module, x, env) of course Both an environment and a module? Is the module not part of the environment? (I would expect a closure to capture the module in which it is created.) > scm_module_ref(mod, sym) Already in module-first order. -- -- Keith Wright <kwright@free-comp-shop.com> Programmer in Chief, Free Computer Shop <http://www.free-comp-shop.com> --- Food, Shelter, Source code. ---