This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
> Yes, that was my point too. To restate, I think for the vast majority of > people who will be using Guile, they decide first what language domain > they want to work in for a specific task, and then think about what > functionality they need, and the manual should reflect that. That's persuasive. But I'm still hung up on the fact that I'll either have to document every Scheme-visible scm_ function twice, or have one section just be cheezy and refer the reader to another section of the manual. That, combined with the appeal of organizing the manual strictly by functionality, and the thought that people can ignore the languages they don't care about, are what make me like the organization I proposed. If you can suggest a good solution to the duplication problem, I might change my mind.