This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Sun, 1 Nov 1998, Keith Wright wrote: > A macro to make Guile's set! return the assigned value is occasionally > useful and mostly harmless, but it is not really worthwhile to try > to emulate SIOD behaviour on undefined variables. Um, are you aware of the context of this discussion? The point is that I have to run scripts written for SIOD in guile. No one claimed that SIOD's behavior is better, or illegal. It is simply incompatible with guile, which is a problem that needed to be solved. > (2) It is pretty easy to take a SIOD script and add a few > (define foo #f) expressions to get a script that works > in both Guile and SIOD. If Guile is small, fast, and > powerful enough to be attractive in itself, this should > be no big problem. Somehow I doubt you'd want to go through a hundred script-fu scripts and add those defines there everywhere.. Lauri Alanko la@iki.fi