This is the mail archive of the guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: g-wrap and guile-gnome/gtk

To: Rob Browning <rlb at cs dot utexas dot edu>
Subject: Re: g-wrap and guile-gnome/gtk
From: Michael Livshin <mlivshin at bigfoot dot com>
Date: 12 Nov 2000 19:35:50 +0200
Cc: Marius Vollmer <mvo at zagadka dot ping dot de>, Ariel Rios <jarios at usa dot net>, guile-gtk at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, Miroslav silovic <silovic at zesoi dot fer dot hr>
Organization: the Church of God the Utterly Indifferent
References: <20001111173022.14524.qmail@nwcst322.netaddress.usa.net><87lmuqnud4.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87lmupf7je.fsf@raven.localnet>

Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> writes:

> Well, since everything's just scheme forms, and since the .defs files
> aren't even allowed to be general scheme syntax, this should be easy.
> We could probably even just write a translator script that was nothing
> more than a set of guile macros that rewrote and "displayed" their
> contents as g-wrap specs.

note that the .defs files are apparently supposed to become the
standard way to specify the bindable interface of the various
Gnome-affiliated C libraries.  i.e. they are not just for Guile
anymore.  so .defs -> .gwp translation approach seems like a very
sensible idea to me, whatever way you happen to implement it.

-- 
All ITS machines now have hardware for a new machine instruction --
CIZ
Clear If Zero.
Please update your programs.

References:
- Fwd: [g-wrap and guile-gnome/gtk]
  - From: Ariel Rios
- Re: g-wrap and guile-gnome/gtk
  - From: Marius Vollmer
- Re: g-wrap and guile-gnome/gtk
  - From: Rob Browning

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]