This is the mail archive of the
gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GSL project.
Re: cvs version: make check FAIL
Lowell Johnson writes:
> Sure, that sounds fine to me. The cost of the extra fabs() is rather
> trivial, but avoiding it will save a few clock cycles.
>
> I've attached a patch to be used in place of the earlier patch.
Thanks, now added to the sources.redhat.com repository.
--
Brian Gough
Network Theory Ltd,
Publishing Free Software Manuals --- http://www.network-theory.co.uk/