This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the GSL project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hello,
I've noticed that the matrix returned by the
function "gsl_multifit_covar" is defined as
(J^T J)^{-1}
Now the problem is that this matrix IS NOT the
(approximated) estimated variance-covariance matrix of the asymptotic
normal distribution of the estimates. This should indeed be defined as
\sigma^2 (J^T J)^{-1}
where
\sigma^2 = \sum_j res_j / (N-K)
res being the residuals, N-K the degrees of freedom.
This behavior of gsl_multifit_covar is strange, first because calling a
"covariance matrix" what the function returns sound a little bit
deceiving and second because it is inconsistent with the covariance
matrix returned by the GSL linear routines (which contain the proper
factor \sigma^2).
Is this a feature or a bug?
Best,
Giulio.
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |