This is the mail archive of the
gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GSL project.
Re: make check error
- To: Matt Newville <newville at cars6 dot cars dot aps dot anl dot gov>
- Subject: Re: make check error
- From: Brian Gough <bjg at network-theory dot co dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 19:53:44 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <14852.27742.292670.517218@localhost>
- Reply-To: gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Matt Newville writes:
> FAIL: qag(f3,31pt) oscill abserr (1.28571716286847917e-14 observed vs 1.28580546442745926e-14 expected)
> FAIL: qag(f3,31pt) oscill neval (403 observed vs 31 expected)
> FAIL: qag(f3,31pt) oscill last (7 observed vs 1 expected)
Do these errors go away with -O0 ? This function also involves
volatile. Perhaps handling of volatile is slightly different with this
compiler -- it is suspicious that the other integration tests all
pass (they don't use volatile).
See the KNOWN-PROBLEMS file for info on the monte failures.