This is the mail archive of the
gsl-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the GSL project.
Re: preparing a 0.4.1 release
- To: Mark Galassi <rosalia@cygnus.com>
- Subject: Re: preparing a 0.4.1 release
- From: Brian Gough <bjg@netsci.freeserve.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 23:12:34 +0000
- CC: GSL discussion list <gsl-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com>
- References: <14012.29239.634305.676150@papageno.roadrunner.com>
In the documentation there are two things I know of:
The change in the definition of complex
The addition of stride to matrix/vector/fft routines
I think you will just have to note those in the NEWS file too.
Mark Galassi wrote:
>
> Dear GSL fans,
>
> The Red Hat 0.6 release will be out some time in the near future, and
> it will include GSL.
>
> It would be important to have them incorporate a rather currnet GSL
> snapshot, rather than the 0.3something version they are using, so that
> packages that use it will use the current complex number API and so
> forth.
>
> I might be able to get the Red Hat people to squeeze in a new 0.4.1
> release of GSL if we hurry up and put it out the door in a day or two.
>
> The excellent specfunc module is not yet complete, and fails a number
> of tests right now, so I have tagged it as "alpha" in the NEWS file.
> There are no other test failures right now.
>
> Can anyone else think of show-stopper bugs or urgent documentation
> shortcomings that we should take care of before this snapshot?