This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug math/13881] powl inaccurate for x86/x86_64


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881

Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fweimer at redhat dot com

--- Comment #7 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to agner@agner.org from comment #5)
> Please reopen.
> 
> powl is still less accurate than pow in version 2.27 (both gcc and clang).
> 
> The attached test case powl.cpp has powl 5 times more inaccurate than pow. I
> have seen worse cases, but I have chosen a test case where it is easy to
> calculate the correct value. I have not seen any case where powl is more
> accurate than pow.

Would you please file a separate bug for that?  Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]