[Bug localedata/18812] kab_DZ: new Kabyle Algeria locale

["maiku.fabian at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18812

--- Comment #26 from Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Belkacem Mohammed from comment #23)
> > > > but your locale contains:
> > > > 
> > > > LC_MESSAGES
> > > > yesexpr "^[+1yYiI]"
> > > > noexpr  "^[-0nNaA]"
> > > > END LC_MESSAGES
> > > > 
> > > > If CLDR is right, shouldn’t noexpr be:
> > > > 
> > > > noexpr  "^[-0nNuU]"
> > > > 
> > > > Or is CLDR mistaken? Then one should fix it in CLDR ...
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > We should probably also add
> > > > 
> > > > yesstr "Ih"
> > > > nostr  "Uhu"
> > > > 
> > > > or whatever the right words for "yes" and "no" are in Kabyle.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > yesstr "Ih"
> > > nostr  "Uhu"
> > > 
> > > Short form
> > > "Y" : "I"
> > > "N" : "U"
> > 
> > Then we should use
> > 
> > noexpr  "^[-0nNuU]"
> > 
> > (u instead of a), right?
> 
> yeah,
> 
> u instead of a. 
> ______
> We have to ways to say No : Uhu(U), Ala(A). Uhu(u) is the most used.

We could also use 

noexpr  "^[-0nNuUaA]"

to make the letters uUaA all acceptable as "no" answers.
There is no conflict with:

yesexpr "^[+1yYiI]"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.