This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/20639] Inconsistency in definitions of fputwc(), putwc() and putwchar() in glibc
- From: "igor.liferenko at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 05:51:43 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/20639] Inconsistency in definitions of fputwc(), putwc() and putwchar() in glibc
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org/bugzilla/>
--- Comment #6 from Igor Liferenko <igor.liferenko at gmail dot com> ---
Is fact, these functions had correct interfaces in "ISO Working Paper
SC22/WG14/N204 dated 31st March 1992" (which is the final draft before
publishing "ISO/IEC 9899:1990/Amendment 1:1995"), but they were changed in
"ISO/IEC 9899:1990/Amendment 1:1995". Can anybody explain the reasoning behind
You may leave the interfaces of these functions as they are now, but at least
please consider changing the type of wint_t to the same as of wchar_t.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.