[Bug libc/15085] New: no-check-names unimplemented but not labeled as such

["jdthood at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15085

             Bug #: 15085
           Summary: no-check-names unimplemented but not labeled as such
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.17
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
        AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
        ReportedBy: jdthood@gmail.com
                CC: drepper.fsp@gmail.com
    Classification: Unclassified


The "no-check-names" option appears to be unimplemented.

    eglibc-2.17/resolv$ grep -ri checkname .
    ./res_init.c:            { STRnLEN ("no-check-names"), 0, RES_NOCHECKNAME
},
    ./res_debug.c:    case RES_NOCHECKNAME:    return "no-check-names";
    ./resolv.h:#define    RES_NOCHECKNAME    0x00008000    /* do not check
names for sanity. */

In resolv.h, unimplemented options are labeled with "!IMPL"

    #define RES_AAONLY      0x00000004      /* authoritative answers only
(!IMPL)*/

but RES_NOCHECKNAME is not so labeled.

    #define RES_NOCHECKNAME 0x00008000      /* do not check names for sanity.
*/

Also, in res_debug.c, unimplemented options are labeled with "unimpl"

    case RES_AAONLY:        return "aaonly(unimpl)";

but RES_NOCHECKNAME is not so labeled.

    case RES_NOCHECKNAME:   return "no-check-names";

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.