This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug dynamic-link/14379] shared object constructors are called in the wrong order


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14379

Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING
                 CC|                            |carlos_odonell at mentor
                   |                            |dot com

--- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com> 2012-07-24 01:40:49 UTC ---
Could you please provide a concrete example including:

(a) Use case where the current ordering causes a problem.

(b) New ordering where the problem is solved. Please describe in detail what
you mean by "it would still be good for deeper dependencies to be
initialized first." 

We need to see more detailed use cases before we can make an informed judgement
here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]