This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug localedata/11213] localedata licencing issues
- From: "pasky at ucw dot cz" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:44:25 +0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/11213] localedata licencing issues
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-11213-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11213
--- Comment #17 from Petr Baudis <pasky at ucw dot cz> 2012-07-16 11:44:25 UTC ---
Keld, I certainly agree that there is a lot of creativity in the way you
designed the locales specification. However, to me that would imply a copyright
on the specification and copyright on the implementation. Individual localedata
files that simply follow the pre-defined format and contain commonly known
facts seem to be a different matter to me?
The compilation copyright seems like a more serious issue.
(Anyhow, I'm not a lawyer so this is an argument I don't want to get into. I'm
looking to a statement from someone at FSF/SFLC.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.