This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug localedata/11213] localedata licencing issues
- From: "tg at mirbsd dot de" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:28:07 +0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/11213] localedata licencing issues
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-11213-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11213
--- Comment #12 from Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd dot de> 2012-07-15 18:28:07 UTC ---
Indeed, the concern was raised in Debian (I stumbled upon it), so the SFLC/FSF
opinion is not enough to close this âas isâ.
However, if the information from the mail you linked is correct, and the data
really consists only of uncopyrightable information, I personally (not speaking
for Debian) believe your way of resolving this (by removing the notices; Iâd
notify the people involved though) is valid.
Jonathan, simply commenting the data does not necessarily add enough âworkâ to
fall under Copyright protection.
/me looks at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=20;filename=wo_SN;att=1;bug=555168
for example, now
This example indeed looks uncopyrightable (but the notion of âbeing put into PD
by its authorâ is offensive). If the others are like this, I hope Debian will
accept the resolution that the problem is not in the inconsistent notices but
that there have been notices put on such data at all. (Note, IANAL, and I donât
speak for the Debian glibc maintainers or ftpmasters or legal people.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.