This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug nptl/651] The getpid() cache (and TLS) is not invalidated after clone() calls
- From: "blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it" <sourceware-bugzilla at sources dot redhat dot com>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 12 Jan 2005 02:09:42 -0000
- Subject: [Bug nptl/651] The getpid() cache (and TLS) is not invalidated after clone() calls
- References: <20050112011749.651.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sources dot redhat dot com
------- Additional Comments From blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it 2005-01-12 02:09 -------
I'll test it against an updated glibc if and when I'll have time, but anyway I
have no reason to doubt on you.
And sorry a lot... I didn't want to "rumble", just to be complete. Detailed
excuses follow, feel free to skip them.
1) I feared that fixing it looked too ugly and too controversial (for the
complexity added to a syscall wrapper, like I said)...
I didn't actually verify that it was on the latest glibc... I tested a 2.3.4
snapshot (20040808) which is the one I run.
but I cc'ed you a patch for UML talking about it some time ago and got no
answer.
(I tested it against glibc-2.3.4.20040808 (a glibc snapshot used in Gentoo,
which is the latest "stable" glibc in Gentoo). And I didn't find any bug report
about this *here*, so I thought it wasn't fixed).
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=651
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.