This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

gdb 7.12.1 does not set zero bit in ARM CPSR register after cmp command during cross debuging


Hello there,

I have a really strange error and I have no idea how this could happen. Maybe you can help me. I am trying to cross debug a binary on an ARM926ej-s running Linux 2.6.35 on top of a microvisor (OKL4).

My testing code looks as follows:

#include <stdio.h>

void printout(unsigned int i){
   if(i == 1){
     printf("1\n");
   }else{
     printf("0\n");
   }
}

int main( int argc, char *argv[] ){
   unsigned int i=1;
   printout(i);
   return 0;
}


If I run the binary without gdb on target I get "1" as output. But if I run it with gdb, using 'single step' command, I get "0" as output. Dissassembly of the if statement looks as follows:

│0x10418 <printout+16> ldr r3, [r11, #-8] │
│0x1041c <printout+20> cmp r3, #1 │
│0x10420 <printout+24> bne 0x10430 <printout+40>

content of r3 is #1. After executing 0x1041c CPSR is still 0x0 but should be 0x40000000 (Zero bit equals 1). Therefore bne does not jump to the right address.

If I step over "printout" function (using next step instruction) I get "1" as output. I tried changing the CPSR register value to 0x40000000 after reaching 0x10420 and now it prints "1". So it looks like while single stepping gdb is overwriting the CPSR register value.

I tried using thumb and arm mode (compile with -marm and -mthumb) but this made no difference. I tried different toolchains with the same result (toolchains build with crosstools-ng 1.23.0 once for armv5t architecture and once for arm296ej-s cpu) but still get the same result.

I also tried the following compiler options:

* cross-gcc -g -O0 main.c -o main
* cross-gcc -ggdb -Oo main.c -o main
* cross-gc -Ogdb main.c -o main

Unfortunately all with the same result.

gdbserver is 7.12.1 (rootfs build via buildroot using the self-build toolchain). I also tried different toolchains from Linaro project, all with the same strange result.

Any idea how this could happen?

Greetings
Sak


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]