This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: using automake to generate Makefile.in

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:03:23 -0500
Subject: Re: using automake to generate Makefile.in
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20160107214249 dot GF25548 at vapier dot lan> <20160108191103 dot GA20883 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <20160108195318 dot GN25548 at vapier dot lan>

On 08 Jan 2016 14:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 08 Jan 2016 20:11, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:42:49 +0100, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > is there a reason we don't use automake in the tree to manage
> > > Makefile.in ?
> > 
> > IIRC Tom Tromey (also a coauthor of automake) wanted to do that or at least he
> > said it would be good to do that but just nobody has never done so.
> 
> do we have a requirement that it be done treewide ?
> or would people be fine with me doing (starting) in sim/ ?
> doing it in just sim/ would allow for some limited testing
> w/out breaking lots of people ...

i probably should have looked harder ... some dirs are already
using automake like ld/ gas/ bfd/ gold/ and more.  i'll convert
sim/ too.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

References:
- using automake to generate Makefile.in
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: using automake to generate Makefile.in
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: using automake to generate Makefile.in
  - From: Mike Frysinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]