This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [BuildBot] News and announcements
- From: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>, "gdb at sourceware dot org" <gdb at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:51:45 -0400
- Subject: Re: [BuildBot] News and announcements
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAGWvnymPtw4_9Fu0drM+EdZA_7r5O8Xiye8zGAqnT_1OGkOhBQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAGWvny=B_DKTXv=NMM=+nuOHcAMOvcNDEgdUu8Smbemr09J8_Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <87r3p3o97k dot fsf at redhat dot com> <878ubbo74z dot fsf at redhat dot com> <878ubbjk7u dot fsf at redhat dot com> <CAGWvnym2wFmgcxsoJXixCeS+qN5RGMwoc8tsrvuicXru+63Ykw at mail dot gmail dot com> <87y4jbi4fw dot fsf at redhat dot com>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior
<sergiodj@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Monday, June 22 2015, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
>>> After dealing with some minor issues, I'm now seeing this:
>>>
>>> <http://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/builders/AIX-POWER7-plain/builds/2/steps/compile%20gdb/logs/stdio>
>>>
>>> I talked to Bergner, who checked this patch in, and he said he doesn't
>>> know why this is happing. I'm also not really interested (and most
>>> importantly, don't have the time) in maintaining the AIX builder(s), so
>>> if you could take a look at this I'd appreciate.
>>>
>>> As a side note, and since you are the interested part in this AIX
>>> buildslave, I was wondering if you want to be the responsible for it.
>>
>> I restarted the buildslave with /opt/freeware/bin in your path, as we
>> had discussed earlier.
>
> As you can see in the link above, the buildslave already has
> /opt/freeware/bin in the PATH, therefore everything was already covered
> in this area before. But thanks for this.
If you have /opt/freeware/bin in your path, you do not need to use gmake.
>> We saw a similar error building GCC a few months ago after the CHKP
>> patches. This means that GDB now has a debug statement that is more
>> than 64K in length. More recent versions of GCC allow debug
>> continuation lines, but this really means that m32c has a ridiculously
>> large enum. It's also bloating the rest of the GDB object files, even
>> if DWARF can handle the length.
>
> Right. Strangely I wasn't seeing this problem when compiling GDB
> manually in the machine, and Peter's commit doesn't touch the m32c file.
Something increased the size of an enum (likely) or other single
debugging entry larger than 64K.
>
>> Yes, I can run the buildslave, if you want.
>
> That would be awesome! It is currently running in my homedir at gcc111,
> but I can stop it so that you can configure the buildslave at your
> homedir if you want. I'd prefer to keep the same name (aix-power7-1).
> I can also send you (in private) the password for the buildslave, along
> with the full command to create it. Let me know when/what you need and
> I'll be happy to help.
I will transfer the info.
- David