This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue 19 Aug 2014 08:25:57 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > so i guess that leaves us with linking against a system copy. i'm fine > > with that too. thoughts ? > > Do I understand correctly that this is the status quo? gdb links against system libs which the FSF has no control over: - python - xz-utils (lzma) - expat - zlib this last one is also included directly in the gcc tree (also the sourceware tree in the past iirc) gcc links to non-FSF 3rd party libs, albeit doesn't bundle them so after talking to myself, i guess the issue isn't so much with using the system copy of dtc as it is with making it a hard requirement (which is different from how the other packages use 3rd party libs -- they're all optional). might be able to reduce the requirement so only the hw layers hard depend on it, but i'm not sure if even that is possible. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |