This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Patchwork patch tracking system
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, Gary Benson <gbenson at redhat dot com>, Stan Shebs <stanshebs at earthlink dot net>, gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:57:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: Patchwork patch tracking system
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140402100842 dot GA956 at blade dot nx> <533F3713 dot 40700 at earthlink dot net> <20140417135040 dot GA891 at blade dot nx> <20140422130652 dot GG5790 at adacore dot com> <8738gw6p4b dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com>
On 04/29/2014 06:07 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I've been trying the patchworks install as well. I don't find it all
> that useful myself, but maybe it would be better if more people were
> using it.
I've been trying it out too. I've already found it useful to keep
track of which of my own patches I have pending.
I've been absent a little while from review, but I'm heading back,
and I'm using patchwork to guide me.
I like that it doesn't make the mailing list a second class
citizen. I'd be willing to continue giving it a try, but indeed I
think it'd be better if more people were using it. That'll be true
for any tool we end up with.
In the past week, I've been cleaning it up whenever I see that
patches have been pushed, even those that I didn't approve myself,
but of course it'd be better if who approves the patch or
the submitter themselves take care of their own patches.
non-maintainers shouldn't hold back from creating an account
and updating the state of their own patches. Whatever helps
bringing the load down from maintainers should help your own
patches. :-)
Here's the current list of who-has-how-many-pending:
$ ~/bin/pwclient-hacked list -s New | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
35 Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>
24 Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
20 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
17 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
16 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
14 Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
13 Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
13 David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
12 Andrew Burgess <aburgess@broadcom.com>
9 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
4 Kyle McMartin <kmcmarti@redhat.com>
4 Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@mentor.com>
3 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
3 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
3 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
2 Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
2 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
2 Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
2 Alexander Smundak <asmundak@google.com>
2 Agovic, Sanimir <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
1 Vladimir Nikulichev <nvs@tbricks.com>
1 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
1 Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
1 Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois@embecosm.com>
1 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
1 Mateusz Tabaka <8tab@wp.pl>
1 Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
1 Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@arm.com>
1 Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
1 Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@codesourcery.com>
1 Julian Brown <julian@codesourcery.com>
1 John Marino <gnugcc@marino.st>
1 Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
1 David Taylor <dtaylor@emc.com>
1 Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson@tallertechnologies.com>
As you see, most of the patches so far, since we began tracking a
few weeks back, came from a small set of people. And I suspect
many of those are actually already in.
--
Pedro Alves