gdb archive
date index for April, 2012

This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 29, 2012
14:40 Memory Dump Hei Chan

April 28, 2012
01:41 Re: [RFC] Extend gdb.Breakpoint to allow setting a breakpoint at the current execution address Tom Tromey

April 27, 2012
19:13 Re: [RFC] Extend gdb.Breakpoint to allow setting a breakpoint at the current execution address Siva Chandra

April 26, 2012
16:21 [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 7.4.1 released! Joel Brobecker

April 25, 2012
18:52 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Maciej W. Rozycki
18:20 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Sterling Augustine
18:13 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Andreas Schwab
17:22 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Maciej W. Rozycki
16:50 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Andreas Schwab
15:57 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Maciej W. Rozycki
11:51 Re: Hardware watchpoint for read Luis Gustavo
10:55 Re: Re[2]: feature request: set step-mode smart Kevin Pouget
10:40 Re: Re[2]: feature request: set step-mode smart Jonas Maebe
10:08 Re[2]: feature request: set step-mode smart Ilya Basin
09:44 Re: feature request: set step-mode smart Jonas Maebe
07:51 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Andreas Schwab
03:20 Re: feature request: set step-mode smart Sergio Durigan Junior
01:15 Re: Hardware watchpoint for read Xin Tong

April 24, 2012
22:11 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Maciej W. Rozycki
20:14 Re: GDB 7.4.1 release on Wed? PaweÅ Sikora
16:21 Re: GDB 7.4.1 release on Wed? Joel Brobecker
15:44 Re: GDB 7.4.1 release on Wed? Joel Brobecker
15:11 Re: Hardware watchpoint for read Luis Gustavo
15:06 Re: Hardware watchpoint for read Xin Tong
14:20 Re: Hardware watchpoint for read Luis Gustavo
14:18 Re: Hardware watchpoint for read Xin Tong
13:19 KGTP (Linux Kernel debugger and tracer) 20120424 release(doc update)[0/3] Hui Zhu
13:18 Re: Hardware watchpoint for read Luis Gustavo
13:16 Re: Hardware watchpoint for read Xin Tong
13:09 Re: Hardware watchpoint for read Luis Gustavo
13:03 Hardware watchpoint for read Xin Tong
05:25 Re: GDB 7.4.1 release on Wed? PaweÅ Sikora

April 23, 2012
23:53 GDB 7.4.1 release on Wed? Joel Brobecker
18:39 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Michael Eager
18:03 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Tom Tromey
18:02 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Pedro Alves
17:58 Re: GDB shared library tests with remote target Michael Eager
17:40 Re: GDB shared library tests with remote target Daniel Jacobowitz
15:49 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Sergio Durigan Junior
14:30 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Tom Tromey
08:55 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Jan Kratochvil
01:13 Re: [Mingw, GDB MI] console redirect question asmwarrior
01:03 [Mingw, GDB MI] console redirect question asmwarrior

April 22, 2012
22:25 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Jeffrey Walton
21:07 Re: GDB shared library tests with remote target Andreas Schwab
20:25 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Sergio Durigan Junior
19:40 Re: GDB shared library tests with remote target Michael Eager
19:30 Re: GDB shared library tests with remote target Andreas Schwab
17:57 GDB shared library tests with remote target Michael Eager
08:23 Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on? Jan Kratochvil
08:06 Switch -Wunused-variable on? Sergio Durigan Junior

April 21, 2012
17:24 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Daniel Jacobowitz
11:07 feature request: set step-mode smart Ilya Basin

April 20, 2012
10:30 Re: Problematic .gdb_index warning regexps in testsuite Gary Benson
10:18 Re: Problematic .gdb_index warning regexps in testsuite Jan Kratochvil
10:12 Re: Problematic .gdb_index warning regexps in testsuite Jan Kratochvil
08:44 Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Jan Kratochvil

April 19, 2012
19:43 Re: cvs problems Christopher Faylor
19:25 Re: GDB/MI and ">" prompts Eli Zaretskii
19:15 Re: cvs problems Pedro Alves
18:53 Re: GDB/MI and ">" prompts (was: Interactive behavior of GDB run from Emacs on Windows) Joel Brobecker
17:49 Re: cvs problems Joel Brobecker
17:36 cvs problems Pedro Alves
16:17 GDB/MI and ">" prompts (was: Interactive behavior of GDB run from Emacs on Windows) Eli Zaretskii
16:11 Re: Interactive behavior of GDB run from Emacs on Windows Eli Zaretskii
15:49 Re: Interactive behavior of GDB run from Emacs on Windows Joel Brobecker
15:46 Interactive behavior of GDB run from Emacs on Windows Eli Zaretskii
15:29 Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Joel Brobecker
15:12 Problematic .gdb_index warning regexps in testsuite Doug Evans
15:10 GDB test suite configuration help Michael Eager
14:17 Re: [RFC] Support ARMv7M FPU registers in GDB Jonathan Larmour
08:43 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Yao Qi
04:25 [RFC] Support ARMv7M FPU registers in GDB Terry Guo

April 18, 2012
23:10 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? John Gilmore
20:56 Re: Will C++ proponents spend 20 minutes to try what they're proposing? Mike Frysinger
20:40 Re: Will C++ proponents spend 20 minutes to try what they're proposing? Tom Tromey
20:38 RE: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Paul_Koning
20:37 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Frank Ch. Eigler
20:36 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Tom Tromey
20:36 Re: Can it really be ok to map GPL'd code into any old process? Pedro Alves
20:34 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Tom Tromey
20:31 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Tom Tromey
20:31 Re: Can it really be ok to map GPL'd code into any old process? John Gilmore
20:27 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Tom Tromey
20:25 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Tom Tromey
20:11 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Tom Tromey
19:23 Re: Will C++ proponents spend 20 minutes to try what they're proposing? Jan Kratochvil
19:18 Will C++ proponents spend 20 minutes to try what they're proposing? John Gilmore
19:07 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Tom Tromey
18:37 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Pedro Alves
18:32 RE: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Paul_Koning
18:12 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Stan Shebs
17:48 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? John Gilmore
17:40 RE: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Paul_Koning
17:28 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Joel Sherrill
16:57 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Joel Brobecker
16:50 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Pedro Alves
16:34 RE: FYI, cvs-to-git mirroring hiccup: just resolved mikhail.terekhov
16:31 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Joel Sherrill
16:23 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Joel Brobecker
16:13 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Jan Kratochvil
16:07 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Joel Brobecker
16:01 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Pedro Alves
15:54 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Jan Kratochvil
15:42 Re: FYI, cvs-to-git mirroring hiccup: just resolved Jim Meyering
15:28 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Pedro Alves
15:18 RE: FYI, cvs-to-git mirroring hiccup: just resolved mikhail.terekhov
15:16 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Jan Kratochvil
14:22 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Pedro Alves
14:11 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Pedro Alves
14:10 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Pedro Alves
14:08 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Pedro Alves
08:05 Re: FYI, cvs-to-git mirroring hiccup: just resolved Jan Kratochvil
08:00 FYI, cvs-to-git mirroring hiccup: just resolved Jim Meyering

April 17, 2012
12:42 Re: [x86-64 psABI] Document STT_GNU_IFUNC and R_X86_64_IRELATIVE Michael Matz

April 16, 2012
18:35 Re: [PATCH v2] tcg/i386: Use GDB JIT debugging interface only for hosts with ELF Tom Tromey
16:52 Re: [x86-64 psABI] Document STT_GNU_IFUNC and R_X86_64_IRELATIVE H.J. Lu
06:55 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Jan Kratochvil

April 14, 2012
21:01 Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] tcg/i386: Use GDB JIT debugging interface only for hosts with ELF Stefan Weil
20:59 Re: [PATCH v2] tcg/i386: Use GDB JIT debugging interface only for hosts with ELF Stefan Weil
16:42 Re: [PATCH v2] tcg/i386: Use GDB JIT debugging interface only for hosts with ELF Richard Henderson

April 13, 2012
19:10 Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Joel Brobecker
13:21 Re: reliabilitâ y of registers contents within each frame Jan Kratochvil
13:16 Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Jan Kratochvil
13:11 Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Jan Kratochvil
13:07 Re: gdb and threads Jan Kratochvil
12:56 Re: Annotations, level 2 Phil Muldoon
12:46 Re: Annotations, level 2 Joel Brobecker
12:16 Re: Annotations, level 2 Pedro Alves
11:20 Annotations, level 2 Phil Muldoon
08:07 RE: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Pierre Muller
00:04 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Doug Evans

April 12, 2012
21:28 RE: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Paul_Koning
20:06 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Daniel Jacobowitz
19:14 Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Joel Brobecker
18:50 reliabilitây of registers contents with in each frame Ivan Di Prima
18:04 Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Paul Smith
17:42 Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Joel Brobecker
17:34 Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Mike Frysinger
17:18 Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Joel Brobecker
16:28 Re: 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Paul Smith
15:33 2 weeks away from potential GDB 7.4.1 release... Joel Brobecker
09:44 gdb and threads Folkert van Heusden
06:18 Re: Useful MI functions marked @ignore in gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo. Carlos O'Donell
05:45 Re: Useful MI functions marked @ignore in gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo. Eli Zaretskii

April 11, 2012
22:07 Re: Useful MI functions marked @ignore in gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo. Carlos O'Donell
21:48 Re: Useful MI functions marked @ignore in gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo. Joel Brobecker
21:30 Useful MI functions marked @ignore in gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo. Carlos O'Donell
14:29 Core file support for bare metal ARM eabi/elf-none-targets? Fredrik Hederstierna

April 10, 2012
15:33 [x86-64 psABI] Document STT_GNU_IFUNC and R_X86_64_IRELATIVE H.J. Lu
15:05 Re: gdb/gnulib problems with BSD operating systems Joel Brobecker
09:47 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Yao Qi
00:23 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Yao Qi

April 09, 2012
23:59 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++? Not. Stan Shebs
23:23 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Stan Shebs
20:15 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Paul Smith
19:49 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Pedro Alves
19:05 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Jan Kratochvil
18:41 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Pedro Alves

April 08, 2012
16:18 GNU Tools Cauldron 2012 - Hotels and registered presentations Diego Novillo

April 07, 2012
16:54 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++? Not. Michael Eager
12:36 An example to use KGTP analyze application performance bottleneck Hui Zhu
12:23 KGTP (Linux Kernel debugger and tracer) 20120406 release(hotcode analyzer hotcode.py can output html) Hui Zhu
01:52 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++? Not. Thomas Dineen
01:04 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++? Not. Robert Dewar

April 06, 2012
23:32 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++? Not. John Gilmore
15:34 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++? Not. Michael Eager
14:43 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++? Not. Russell Shaw
13:16 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++? Not. Joel Brobecker
01:35 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++? Not. Russell Shaw
00:35 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++? Not. John Gilmore

April 05, 2012
12:04 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Stefano Lattarini
11:46 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Phil Muldoon
09:44 RE: gdb/gnulib problems with BSD operating systems Pierre Muller
03:31 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Sergio Durigan Junior
00:22 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? asmwarrior

April 04, 2012
21:55 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Mark Kettenis
20:48 Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? Tom Tromey
15:01 Re: PR13901 Pedro Alves
14:47 Re: PR13901 Tristan Gingold
14:23 Re: PR13901 Pedro Alves
13:18 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Joseph S. Myers
09:03 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Pedro Alves
07:47 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Stefano Lattarini
07:43 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Stefano Lattarini

April 03, 2012
23:53 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Miles Bader
21:40 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Pedro Alves
21:08 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Ian Lance Taylor
20:40 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Tom Tromey
20:29 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Stefano Lattarini
20:05 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Stefano Lattarini
20:04 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Stefano Lattarini
15:43 Gdb get stuck when debugging linux kernel Parmenides
08:23 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Joern Rennecke
07:28 Re: PR13901 John Gilmore

April 02, 2012
21:10 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Ian Lance Taylor
20:50 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Stefano Lattarini
20:19 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Tom Tromey
19:51 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Stefano Lattarini
19:37 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Tom Tromey
17:28 Re: PR13901 Andreas Schwab
16:31 Re: PR13901 Pedro Alves
16:22 Re: PR13901 Andreas Schwab
15:30 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Stefano Lattarini
15:23 Re: PR13901 Pedro Alves
15:17 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Tom Tromey
15:08 Re: PR13901 Tristan Gingold
15:04 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Stefano Lattarini
14:59 Re: PR13901 Andreas Schwab
14:26 Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option Tom Tromey
14:25 Re: PR13901 Tristan Gingold
14:18 Re: gdb/gnulib problems with BSD operating systems Tom Tromey
14:17 Re: PR13901 Pedro Alves
14:17 Re: gdb/gnulib problems with BSD operating systems Tom Tromey
14:07 Re: PR13901 Tristan Gingold
13:56 Re: PR13901 Pedro Alves
13:22 Re: PR13901 Tristan Gingold
13:17 Re: PR13901 Jack Howarth
11:57 Re: PR13901 Tristan Gingold
10:44 Re: PR13901 Tristan Gingold

April 01, 2012
10:44 Re: very slow gdb stepping. PaweÅ Sikora
09:19 Re: very slow gdb stepping. PaweÅ Sikora

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3