This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Pending breakpoints on lines that don't exist

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
Cc: marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:07:06 -0500
Subject: Re: Pending breakpoints on lines that don't exist
References: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC578D18D642@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <20120104035128.GP2742@adacore.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 07:51:28 +0400
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: "'gdb@sourceware.org'" <gdb@sourceware.org>
> 
> I think that the idea is that another objfile, typically a shared
> library, might appear later on. If that shared library has a file
> where this line number is valid, we want the breakpoint to include
> this location.  Does that make sense?

Not to me, FWIW.  At the very least, we should have asked a different
question than we ask in the "normal" pending-breakpoint use case.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pending breakpoints on lines that don't exist
  - From: Joel Brobecker

References:
- Pending breakpoints on lines that don't exist
  - From: Marc Khouzam
- Re: Pending breakpoints on lines that don't exist
  - From: Joel Brobecker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]