This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, binutils at sourceware dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:51:31 +0200
Subject: Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src
References: <20090816150957.GA24096@gmx.de> <20090816151338.GB24096@gmx.de> <4A88395D.803@gnu.org> <20090818184110.GC30742@gmx.de> <m3ocqcbrhc.fsf@google.com>

On 08/19/2009 02:02 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

Ralf Wildenhues<Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de> writes:

The merge of toplevel synced files from GCC to src
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.binutils/42983/focus=26485>
still doesn't have one small nod that I would like from a src maintainer:

* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:52:45PM CEST:

- the files move from GPLv2 to GPLv3 header.  Is that a problem for
   anything in src?

I honestly don't know.


I can't see why this would be a problem, as the GNU binutils and gdb
moved to GPLv3 some time ago.

Great, I was not sure about that.

Paolo

References:
- sync toplevel between GCC and src
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]