This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Re: MI *stopped versus silent breakpoint
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 06:24:41PM -0500, Marc Khouzam wrote:
> In the scenario you mention, having a proper *stopped event for
> silent bp would pretty much be unnoticed by the user thanks to the
> *running event that immediately follows (the frontend would stop and
> resume right away.) Same situation for the reverse-finish situation.
Is any FE likely to get upset that threads resume without its
"permission"? You'd probably see the *stopped, try to get a stack
frame, and then get a *running instead...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery