This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB version numbering

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: brobecker at adacore dot com, cagney at redhat dot com, nickrob at snap dot net dot nz, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:14:17 +0300
Subject: Re: GDB version numbering
References: <18066.2956.730647.124877@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070709172235.GA3876@adacore.com> <18066.47945.530232.677872@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <4693BACE.3030000@redhat.com> <20070710192534.GA3943@adacore.com> <20070710193321.GA26842@caradoc.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> > >    GDB 7 is GPLv3+
> > >    GDB 6 is GPLv2+
> > 
> > Indeed. What do others think?
> 
> I think that moving the source code repository into the open marked a
> fundamental change in the timeline of GDB, and changing to the GPLv3
> will make at best a small bump.  GPLv3 is a big deal spread out over
> the whole GNU project, but not a big deal for GDB in particular.

100% agreement.

References:
- GDB version numbering
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: GDB version numbering
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: GDB version numbering
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: GDB version numbering
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: GDB version numbering
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: GDB version numbering
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]