This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: New Ada failure

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, gdb at sourceware dot org, brobecker at adacore dot com
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 18:27:38 -0500
Subject: Re: New Ada failure
References: <20070104202406.GA26522@nevyn.them.org> <459D8940.3030908@adacore.com> <200701042321.l04NLsve013656@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <459D8D2E.2010405@adacore.com>

On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 06:26:38PM -0500, Robert Dewar wrote:
> Sure, but you can do so fine if you build the library correctly,
> which means not removing debugging information for this unit!
> Not clear it is worth extra work to deal with misconfigured libraries.

When you come up with a magic incantation to strip debugging
information from a shared library except for one unit, please,
do let us know :-)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- New Ada failure
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: New Ada failure
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: New Ada failure
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: New Ada failure
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]