This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GDB 6.5.90 available for testing (GDB 6.6 pre-release)


On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:36:20PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >
> >  Here's the patch I've been using for this.  It'd be better to rework
> >  the way those functions use those obstacks, but...
> >
> >  2006-12-05  Jim Blandy  <jimb@codesourcery.com>
> >
> >        * cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields, cp_print_value):
> >        Initialize tmp_obstack, to avoid warnings.
> >        * p-valprint.c (pascal_object_print_value_fields)
> >        (pascal_object_print_value): Same.
> 
> This is silly, at least if they are really unecessary.  It's a bug in GCC
> and should be fixed.  I mean, GCC should get better at detecting this sort
> of things; not give more false positives.
> 
> Markus, can you file a GCC bug report for this?

I'm pretty sure the GCC bug was fixed in later versions of 4.1.x
already.  At least, my compiler no longer warns about it.  But I have
no idea how reliable that is - I can't see any vaguely efficient way to
compute this.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]