This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfc/remote] Tell remote stubs which signals are boring


> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:37:32 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:27:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Perhaps I should even add more confusing statements to that.  What if I say
> > "handle SIGALRM nostop noprint pass" after I've connected to the remote
> > target.  Will it send a new  QPassSignals packet when I do that?  AFAICT
> > from your patch it doesn't do that, and that seems broken to me.
> 
> In fact it will do that.  We check that the most recently sent
> QPassSignals packet matches the current set of ignored signals
> at every resume.

Cool!


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]