This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfc/remote] Tell remote stubs which signals are boring


> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:24:41 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> This is the solution I came up with for that problem, adjusted to HEAD
> and given a more sensible packet name.  I have a tested implementation
> of this patch for HEAD, if my remote protocol choices are acceptable.
> The new mechanism is completely transparent to the user.

I'm confused: shouldn't this packet be automatically sent to a remote
target when I say, e.g., "handle SIGALRM nostop noprint pass"?  Am I
missing something?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]