BTW, this does make me think about the original request
differently; it
does seem a bit awkward to have to delete and recreate breakpoints
every time the user edits a source file. Maybe it isn't. I don't
know...
Just my few cents:
To me, it was initially expected and normal. But then there are some
issues GUIs have to be careful of, probably derived from the fact that
the new breakpoint would have a different ID. They have to transfer
over conditions expressions, command lists, etc.
For some reason I can't put my finger on, I feel against such a
feature,
but then it would make things simpler for the GUI, and the user would
not be confused by a different breakpoint number when the location
is modified...
Doesn't seem like something that would be too hard to implement
either,
right? Something like "move-breakpoint break-id new-location". If it
added to GDB, I would make it available for CLI as well, might as
well.
--
Joel