Re: breakpoint commands no more working due to MI front-end

[Bob Rossi <bob at brasko dot net>]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:36:57PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:05:45PM +0100, David Lamy-Charrier wrote:
> > Thanks Daniel for the idea, I am going to try it.
> > 
> > But if I am right, mi_execute_command is called to handle MI commands
> > from the front-end, so it is already too late to execute the commands
> > associated with the breakpoint.
> > The commands should have been executed before and the front-end should
> > even not be notified that GDB stopped and continued, no?
> 
> That would require a much bigger change to the way GDB works.  We've
> been talking about some related changes; the general question is
> whether the MI front end should know that something other than itself
> has caused the inferior to change state.  This is vital to have
> multiple interpreters active at the same time.
> 
> Given how MI works and is defined today, I don't think breakpoint
> commands make a whole lot of sense: your front end should supply the
> commands when it sees the breakpoint.  Is there a reason you can't make
> CDT do that?

I think not allowing this would severaly limit the use of GDB for a lot
of users. People in general already have an entire set of breakpoint
commands written. I don't think it would be a good idea to make the
users translate these commands to a FE specific format, especially 
since each front end would be different.

Bob Rossi