This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Using reverse execution

From: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Min Xu (Hsu)" <xu at cs dot wisc dot edu>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:42:32 -0700
Subject: Re: Using reverse execution
References: <432628AA.2040808@apple.com> <20050913181057.GH5161@cs.wisc.edu> <m3mzmgiq64.fsf@alligator.red-bean.com>

Jim Blandy wrote:

- Getting signals like SIGIO or SIGWINCH to arrive at exactly the same
 points is something I just don't know how to do.  It's clear how to
 take and restore snapshots, but it's not clear how to recognize when
 a system has re-reached a given state and should have its signal
 re-delivered.

I think you'd have to get hints from the system, and similarly for
thread switching.

Stan

References:
- Using reverse execution
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: Using reverse execution
  - From: Min Xu (Hsu)
- Re: Using reverse execution
  - From: Jim Blandy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]