Re: in_solib_call_trampoline

[Kris Warkentin <kewarken at qnx dot com>]

Well, on the bright side, it turns out there's no problem with solibs 
and backtraces.  It turns out that I'm an idiot and chased this problem 
all week only just now to notice that symbols weren't being loaded for 
the solibs.  So the problem is with auto-loading of symbols, not 
backtracing and solib support.

On the bright side, in looking at the linux support, I was able to rip a 
few things out of our tdep files and generally simplify things so it 
wasn't a complete waste of a week.  Still feel a bit of a dork though....;-)

Have a good weekend and thanks for the help.

cheers,

Kris

Randolph Chung wrote:

> > > I'm a bit confused here myself, but I have you taken a look at
> > > skip_trampoline_code?
> > >      
> > I thought that gdbarch_skip_solib_resolver and
> > in_solib_dynsym_resolve_code would be enough.  I'm not sure if all the
> > current skip_trampoline_code bits are necessary.
> >    
>
> Well, on hppa skip_trampoline_code knows about quite a few other types
> of trampolines in addition to solib PLT trampolines.
>
> randolph
>  

--
Stay up-to-date on all the QNX news!  Register at
http://www.qnx.com/news/forms/newsletter.html to
receive our newsletter.