This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: MI-related testsuite regressions

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Bob Rossi <bob at brasko dot net>
Cc: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>, Mark Kettenis <kettenis at gnu dot org>,gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:59:01 -0400
Subject: Re: MI-related testsuite regressions
References: <200506270815.j5R8FZO6026261@jop31.nfra.nl> <17087.60064.541364.938844@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050627130030.GA10394@nevyn.them.org> <17088.1264.104928.522819@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050627135610.GA19376@white>

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:56:10AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> > As far as I can see mi3 does nothing that mi2 doesn't do.
> 
> I think the ideology is that mi3 is allowed to change in such a way that
> mi2 is not. So, all new features go into mi3, while mi2 should remain
> stable and unchanged, except for bug fixes and minor new improvements
> that are backwards compatible.

Yes.  I misread; what I should have said was "-i=mi3 exists today".

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

References:
- MI-related testsuite regressions
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- MI-related testsuite regressions
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: MI-related testsuite regressions
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: MI-related testsuite regressions
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: MI-related testsuite regressions
  - From: Bob Rossi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]