Re: Ada and the "start" command

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>]

On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 04:33:37PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> 
> Do any of the gdb.ada tests pass for you, using a clean GDB tree?  My
> impression is that the "start" command, upon which they all rely, can
> not possibly work in FSF GDB.  There's ada_main_name, which correctly
> digs the name out of the executable, but it isn't hooked up to
> anything.  So "start" always goes to "main".
> 
> If the tests can't work in this tree, they should be disabled.  I'm not
> sure what the plan for ada_main_name is.

Scratch the last sentence; I found the pending patch on gdb-patches.  I
still do not like tests which will not yet pass being added to the
source tree.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC