This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: patch review time

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Cc: Bob Rossi <bob at brasko dot net>, rjshaw at netspace dot net dot au, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:16:55 -0500
Subject: Re: patch review time
References: <16938.5992.336181.640228@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20050305220619.GA4481@white> <422A4B04.40507@netspace.net.au> <20050306134803.GC5776@white> <01c5227d$Blat.v2.4$27e1e820@zahav.net.il>

On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 20:47 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 08:48:04 -0500
> > From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> > 
> > and for some reason, no one else in this community bothers to stand up
> > for what should be right. 
> 
> I think this is a gross misrepresentation of the reality, to say the
> least.  You can find lots of evidence to the contrary in the archives.
> 
Yes.
In fact, you'll find this fight has been fought for years. :)

References:
- Re: patch review time
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: patch review time
  - From: Bob Rossi
- Re: patch review time
  - From: Russell Shaw
- Re: patch review time
  - From: Bob Rossi
- Re: patch review time
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]