This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB's low hanging backlog

From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
To: Baurjan Ismagulov <ibr at ata dot cs dot hun dot edu dot tr>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:03:18 -0400
Subject: Re: GDB's low hanging backlog
References: <4116A287.7000108@gnu.org> <412B9A7D.1080304@gnu.org> <20040824224125.GA7869@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr>

Hello, Andrew!

On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:43:57PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
-- i18n
-- CXX compile
I could try one of these if I finish the test case soon. Why is the
latter important?

Yes, i18n is far more important than CXX compile.

CXX compile, however is medium/long term strategic. As with GCC we need to start clearing obsticals blocking an eventual migration to an OO language (and failing that, C++ :-).

Andrew

References:
- GDB's low hanging backlog
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: GDB's low hanging backlog
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: GDB's low hanging backlog
  - From: Baurjan Ismagulov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]