This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: translate PC to statement


Ramana,

Thank you very much for the reply. I realize I didn't explain my question well
enough. Basically, the instructions that I am interested in are always loads
or stores on SPARC. I am particularly interested in known what's the variable
the instruction is accessing. I Imagine that information can be obtained
statically, without need of a live frame, since the instruction is always
accessing some variable encoded in some source code statements.

Thanks for the info on RTL debug dump and dwarfdump, I will check it out.

-Min

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote :
> Hey Min,
> 
> 
> >Hi There,
> >
> >Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I couldn't find answer using 
> >either google or gdb manual.
> >
> >Basically I want to know what part of a source code statement produced a 
> >instruction in the final binary. I have used "info line *(pc)" command, 
> >which gives me pretty good information on what line produced the PC. 
> >However, I wanted more information than just the source line. 
> 
> Can you define more information and then maybe we can suggest something ?
> 
> 
> >I compiled 
> >my program with -g. I wonder if this information is kept in the debug 
> >information? How can I query it? It would be nice if I can obtain some 
> >information such as why a given instruction is generated from a source 
> >line. 
> 
> Because the compiler generated it ;-) . If you want more information 
> about how an instruction is generated by gcc / which pattern in the 
> backend of gcc matches with the instruction, maybe you could use the RTL 
> debug dumps to look at stuff. But this might not be the right list to 
> query about it.
> 
> 
> 
> >This is some times not obvious at all. For example, I often get a 
> >instruction that map back to a source line that has only a "{"!
> 
> Further if the debug format is in Dwarf2 you might try using dwarfdump 
> (Don't remember the link , so do a google for it ) and use the 
> information it prints out about the debug information in your program .
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> cheers
> Ramana
> 
> 
> >
> >I'd really appreciate your help.
> >
> >-Min
> >
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]