This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: vB() versus vB(void)

From: David Carlton <carlton at kealia dot com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 08:43:35 -0800
Subject: Re: vB() versus vB(void)
References: <20040204035053.432FF4B364@berman.michael-chastain.com><20040204035354.GA13879@nevyn.them.org>

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 22:53:54 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:

> Secondly, you tell me.  Which form is preferable in general - I used to
> think (void) but the demangler, which I've been using as a rough style
> guide lately, disagrees.  Which form is preferable for default
> constructors?  Probably ().

I like () - I think of (void) as an unfortunate legacy of K&R C.

David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com

References:
- vB() versus vB(void)
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: vB() versus vB(void)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]