This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Proposal: obsolete target hppa*-hp-hpux10.*
- From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, brobecker at act-europe dot fr,dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 12:12:36 -0500
- Subject: Re: Proposal: obsolete target hppa*-hp-hpux10.*
- References: <20040108025031.4FA984B35A@berman.michael-chastain.com>
I propose to obsolete this target in gdb 6.1 and remove it in gdb 6.2:
hppa*-hp-hpux10.*
Ah, you've figured out my strategy: shake the tree, see what falls out
:-) "go for it".
This does not include hppa*-hp-hpux11.*, which has active development.
Reasons for removing this configuration:
. gdb 6.0 does not build on this configuration.
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1411
Build of gdb-6.0 on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 fails
This is a different build failure than the build failures
with hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
. there is no development activity for this target
. there is no QA activity for this target
. HP's test drive cluster does not include an hp-ux 10.* machine
. HP has discontinued and obsoleted hp-ux 10.*
http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/tech/tech_TechDocumentDetailPage_IDX/1,1701,5143,00.html
frequently asked questions -- hp-ux
2002-06-30 hp-ux 10.20 removed from corporate price list
2003-06-30 hp-ux 10.20 product support no longer available from HP
Reasons for keeping this configuration:
. Someone (me) is actively working on native hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
Can I guess that you're, at least in part, working on 11.11 because it
is a stable PA RISC based platform and offers a path for getting
GNU/Linux PA out of limbo?
If gdb works on hpux 11.11, the incremental effort for development
and QA of hpux 10.20 is not as big.
This isn't sufficient to justify requiring you spending your volunteer
time on that system. If someone is willing to step forward and help,
that would be really appreciated.
. There is at least one user (Dave A), which means that there are
probably more users.
Philosophically, I see the issue as priorities. It takes work to
maintain and QA gdb on hpux 10.20. It takes work even if gdb on hpux
11.11 is already working. I would rather spend my attention somewhere
else, and so would everybody else in the world, judging by the level of
activity.
Yes.
Andrew