This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Jim Ingham writes:The all the targets we support in Apple's version of gdb are async -
including the Mach-O native target. It took a bunch of mucking around
to get it working (and to get things like commands that run the target
working). And I am pretty sure that I broke the remote async in the
process, however, there were a couple of hacks in there (marked as such
in the code) that messed us up and I didn't have the patience at the
time to make both work...
So I would need to do some clean-up before our code would be ready for submission, but as a proof of concept it might be useful to folks, and in our system it works pretty well.
It seems to have become some kind of a pattern that somebody other than Apple is going to merge Apple's changes with the FSF mainline. Is there any way to get another snapshot/tarball (like it was done in Dec 2001)? Maybe somebody will volunteer, even though this approach is suboptimal.
elena_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Jim
On Nov 6, 2003, at 6:32 AM, gdb-digest-help@sources.redhat.com wrote:
Whoops. I agree, this is screwed up. I'll just make the fix now, no need to file a bug report. I am curious, did somebody get async native to work? So far there is only the remote async target. I do remember testing this, back 4 years ago, maybe the logic got turned around at some point.
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- Jim Ingham jingham@apple.com Developer Tools - gdb
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |