This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
>But suppose we have this: >foo.c:static int *bar; >bar.c:static int *bar; > >(gdb) watch *bar > > >It watches whatever *bar would print, which is one of them. No easy way to >get at the other or describe the ambiguity. I wonder once again whether the >two-level scheme is really correctly designed; but I have no better ideas. You should be able to specify 'watch func::*bar' where func is the name of a function that has scope on the *bar you are interested in. I haven't tried this myself, but 'p/x func::foo' is something I've done too many times to count so reason leads me to believe that the watch command should use the same evaluator, right? -- Peter Barada peter@baradas.org
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |