This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB schedule.

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:50:32 -0400
Subject: Re: GDB schedule.
References: <200310061954.h96JsfCP008508@duracef.shout.net>

I would rather skip gdb 6.0.1 unless something happens in the field
that mandates it.  Less work on the branch => more resources for HEAD.

Apparently location expressions don't work (I'm wondering why the test results didn't identify this, sigh).

The fix is small so its the sort of thing that can be cheaply pushed into 6.0.1.

However, yes, given the choice, I'd also also prefer to not do a 6.0.1.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GDB schedule.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- Re: GDB schedule.
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]