Re: GDB 6 branch, 21st June?

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>]

Andreas Jaeger writes:
 > Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
 > 
 > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 08:39:20AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
 > >> >Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
 > >> >
 > >> >
 > >> >>Still scheduled for 21st, how is that looking?
 > >> >
 > >> >
 > >> >We currently have the following results from make check on
 > >> >x86_64-linux-gnu:
 > >> >
 > >> >                === gdb Summary ===
 > >> >
 > >> ># of expected passes            8930
 > >> ># of unexpected failures        100
 > >> ># of unexpected successes       4
 > >> ># of expected failures          46
 > >> ># of known failures             23
 > >> ># of unresolved testcases       3
 > >> ># of untested testcases         6
 > >> ># of unsupported tests          1
 > >> >/usr/src/aj/build/gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version  2003-06-16-cvs 
 > >> >-nx
 > >> >
 > >> >
 > >> >How does this look in comparison with other platforms?
 > >> 
 > >> Pretty much on par.  break main, run, next definitly works.
 > >
 > > i386-linux is down at around ten failures.  Alpha's a bit higher,
 > 
 > Ten failures sounds fine!
 > 
 > > sparc's really rotten (thousands).
 > 
 > I hope that even if we branch on the 21st, we have the possibility to
 > get fixes for those failures on x86_64 into the branch?  Unfortunatly
 > Michal is on vacation until the 28th and cannot do anything himself -
 > and I'm also occupied :-(
 > 
 > Andreas
 > -- 
 >  Andreas Jaeger
 >   SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
 >    private aj@arthur.inka.de
 >     http://www.suse.de/~aj


Usually we allow for a period of bugfixes/stabilization on the branch.

Here are my results on RHL9:

TODAY:
                === gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes            8970
# of unexpected failures        98
# of unexpected successes       4
# of expected failures          46
# of known failures             22
# of unresolved testcases       3
# of unsupported tests          1


while on 6-6-2003 I was getting a few less failures:

                === gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes            8868
# of unexpected failures        87
# of unexpected successes       4
# of expected failures          46
# of known failures             21
# of unresolved testcases       3
# of unsupported tests          1


here are the regressions/differences:


+FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: until 79
+FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: break on default location, 2nd time
+FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: break on default location, 3rd time
+FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: break on default location, 4th time
+Running /home/ezannoni/gdb-sources/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/fileio.exp ...
+FAIL: gdb.base/fileio.exp: Renaming a directory to a non-empty directory returns ENOTEMPTY or EEXIST
 Running /home/ezannoni/gdb-sources/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/store.exp ...
-FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: next field 1
-FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: next field 2
-FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: next field 3
-FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: next field 4
+FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - char
+FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - short
+FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - int
+FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - long
+FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - longest
+FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - float
+FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - double
+FAIL: gdb.base/store.exp: up print old r - doublest
+FAIL: gdb.threads/linux-dp.exp: philosopher is distinct: 3
+FAIL: gdb.threads/linux-dp.exp: philosopher is distinct: 7