This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: c++/cfront puzzler
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: ezannoni at redhat dot com
- Cc: drow at mvista dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 14:32:54 -0600
- Subject: Re: c++/cfront puzzler
Elena Z says:
> [ezannoni@localhost ezannoni]$ rpm -q --provides libstdc++-2.96-108.7.2
> libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
> libstdc++ = 2.96-108.7.2
Oh, well, one of the mysteries of C++ backwards compatibility.
I say that it's harmless to leave the little block of 'T' code in,
because it will never hurt anything. Daniel J says that it's harmless
to take it out, because it will never actually be used. I suspect that
we're both right and that either way will work.
Michael C