This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: recent changes to frame pointer handling on trunk?
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jafa <jafa at silicondust dot com>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 22:44:04 -0500
- Subject: Re: recent changes to frame pointer handling on trunk?
- References: <039901c29b42$78f38fd0$f601a8c0@nkelseyxp> <3DED783E.4050601@redhat.com>
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:36:30PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Hi guys,
> >
> >
> >
> >I am working from the gdb trunk and the ip2k port of gdb.
>
> (unless I'm missing something) GDB does not include a port to the ip2k.
> Suggest contacting who ever supplied you with this GDB.
<translation>
He's the one writing the ip2k port, I believe...
> >I have been running a trunk snapshot from about 4 weeks ago and when asked
> >for the frame-pointer I go and figure it out (the fp isn't normally stored
> >by the c-compiler).
> >
> >
> >
> >I just updated to the trunk and now the frames are all wrong.
> >
> >
> >
> >What I am seeing is that my code figures the FP out correctly (for example
> >SP+10) but instead of looking for the first parameter at FP+0, it looks for
> >the first parameter at FP+10.
> >
> >
> >
> >Does this make any sense to anyone?
> >
> >
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >Nick
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer