Funny, no one reports this for months and this is the third report I've
seen in a week... At the bottom of this message is a workaround. I'm
not proposing it be committed, since it's obviously pretty gross. The
real issue is the concept of thread_stratum and core_stratum as
separate from process_stratum. I don't think it's appropriate - if we
are debugging a core and process at the same time this isn't how it
should work. This ties in to all the make-targets-a-real-stack thing -
I'm not entirely convinced on that score either.
GDB Speak :-) `An inferior stack', separate to the stratum. Having
implemented the idea, I'm pretty much convinced it's the correct
approach (although, as you demonstrate, not absolutly necessary).